Review is one step of the job. Once a cut is approved it still has to go somewhere: downloaded, re-uploaded, retitled for each platform, posted by whoever has the logins. Most of the time between "approved" and "live" is spent moving a file from one tool to the next.
JubJub keeps review and publishing in one workspace. The cut your team comments on is the cut that goes out, to the channels you connected, with the approval on record. If you are looking for a Frame.io alternative because your video ends up on YouTube, TikTok or Instagram rather than in an edit suite, this is the part that changes.
Comments on the moment, notes on the frame.
Open a piece and play it. Pause where something is wrong and leave a comment: it is pinned to that moment, and anyone who clicks it later lands back on the same frame. Nobody has to write "at about 40 seconds" again.
When words are not enough, draw. Reviewers mark the frame with a pen, an arrow or a highlight, in a choice of colours, and the drawing is saved with the comment. Tag a teammate with an @mention so the note reaches the person who can fix it.
Every cut kept. Every decision on record.
Upload a new version, keep the old ones.
A new cut is a new version of the same piece, not a new file to hunt for. Earlier versions stay, each with its own comments, so feedback on version 2 never gets mixed up with version 3. Made a change you regret? Make an earlier version current again.
Approve, or ask for changes.
A reviewer approves a version or requests changes, with a note. Every decision is kept under the version with who made it and when, so "who signed this off?" has an answer.
Decide who can send.
The workspace owner decides who can approve a publish. A send from anyone else waits for that approval, and a send to a channel a teammate connected waits for that teammate.
The cut your team approved is the cut that goes out. No download, no re-upload, no wrong file.
From approved to published, in the same workspace.
Connect YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, Vimeo or Farcaster once, with your own logins. From then on the approved piece publishes to any of them from the workspace it was reviewed in, one channel or all of them, now or at a time you set, with the title, description and visibility set per platform.
When it goes out, JubJub keeps an ownership record of the piece and pulls the numbers back from every platform it went to, so the same workspace shows how the cut is doing.
Review
The part a review tool does, kept simple.
- Comments pinned to the moment
- Pen, arrow and highlight on the frame
- Versions, approvals and @mentions
Publish
The part that usually means another tool.
- Every connected channel from one place
- Now or on a schedule
- Analytics back from each platform
Is it the right switch for you?
Frame.io is a well-made review tool, and plenty of teams should keep it. The honest question is where your video goes after review.
- If your cut goes to social and video channels, JubJub covers review and the publish that follows, in one place, for free.
- If your review sits inside a post-production pipeline, check what each tool connects to first. JubJub is built around the channels a video goes out on, not around an edit suite.
- If you only need review, try both with the same cut and keep the one your team actually uses.







